Visit the Thesaurus for More You Can Believe This History of Plausible Today the word plausible usually means "reasonable" or "believable," but it once held the meanings "worthy of being applauded" and "approving. Examples of plausible in a Sentence I watch the ospreys who nest on Perch Island high atop their white spruce.
References and Further Reading 1. In the Euthyphro, for instance, Socrates seeks to know the nature of piety: Yet what he seeks is not given in terms of, for example, a list of pious people or actions, nor is piety to be identified with what the gods love.
Instead, Socrates seeks an account of piety in terms of some specification of what is shared by all things pious, or what makes pious things pious—that is, he seeks a specification of the essence of piety itself. The Socratic elenchus is a method of finding out the nature or essence of various kinds of things, such as friendship discussed in the Lysiscourage the Lachesknowledge the Theatetusand justice the Republic.
That method of considering candidate definitions and seeking counterexamples to them is the same method one uses to test candidate analyses by seeking possible counterexamples to them, and thus Socrates is in effect committed to something very much like the classical view of concepts. One sees the same sort of commitment throughout much of the Western tradition in philosophy from the ancient Greeks through the present.
Particular examples of classical-style analyses abound after Aristotle: For instance, Descartes in Meditation VI defines body as that which is extended in both space and time, and mind as that which thinks. The classical view looks to be a presumption of the early analytic philosophers as well with Wittgenstein being a notable exception.
The classical view is present in the writings of Frege and Russell, and the view receives its most explicit treatment by that time in G.
Moore gives a classical analysis of the very notion of a classical analysis, and from then on the classical view or some qualified version of it has been one of the pillars of analytic philosophy itself.
One reason the classical view has had such staying power is that it provides the most obvious grounding for the sort of inquiry within philosophy that Socrates began.
If one presumes that there are answers to What is F? The nature of knowledge, for example, is that which is shared by all cases of knowledge, and a classical analysis of the concept of knowledge specifies the nature of knowledge itself. So the classical view fits neatly with the reasonable presumption that there are legitimate answers to philosophical questions concerning the natures or essences of things.
As at least some other views of concepts reject the notion that concepts have metaphysically necessary conditions, accepting such other views is tantamount to rejecting or at least significantly revising the legitimacy of an important part of the philosophical enterprise. The classical view also serves as the ground for one of the most basic tools of philosophy—the critical evaluation of arguments.
For instance, one ground of contention in the abortion debate concerns whether fetuses have the status of moral persons or not.
If they do, then since moral persons have the right not to be killed, generally speaking, then it would seem to follow that abortion is immoral. The classical view grounds the natural way to address the main contention here, for part of the task at hand is to find a proper analysis of the concept of being a moral person.
If that analysis specifies features such that not all of them are had by fetuses, then fetuses are not moral persons, and the argument against the moral permissibility of abortion fails. But without there being analyses of the sort postulated by the classical view, it is far from clear how such critical analysis of philosophical arguments is to proceed.
So again, the classical view seems to underpin an activity crucial to the practice of philosophy itself. In contemporary philosophy, J. KatzFrank Jackson, and Christopher Peacocke are representative of those who hold at least some qualified version of the classical view.
There are others as well, though many philosophers have rejected the view at least in part due to the criticisms to be discussed in section 4 below.
The view is almost universally rejected in contemporary psychology and cognitive science, due to both theoretical difficulties with the classical view and the arrival of new theories of concepts over the last quarter of the twentieth century. Concepts in General The issue of the nature of concepts is important in philosophy generally, but most perspicuously in philosophy of language and philosophy of mind.Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on economic arteensevilla.comy related to economic liberalism, it developed in the early 19th century, building on ideas from the previous century as a response to urbanization and to the Industrial Revolution in Europe and the United States.
Buy The Principles of Quantum Mechanics on arteensevilla.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders. Classical Principles or Argument Essay Words Apr 11th, 5 Pages The classical principles of arguments are described as an argument synthesis which is a claim that reasonable people could disagree with.
The argument also consists of an introduction, body and conclusion. It also is built around a major premise (in this instance, called the Proposition rather than the Thesis Statement). Additionally, there is a definite pattern of organization used in developing the argument.
If a stimulus that results in an emotional response is repeated alongside another stimulus which does not cause an emotional response, eventually the second stimulus will result in the same emotional response. Principles Classical Principles of Argument University of Phoenix Cassondra Capers ENG/ September 21, Dr.
Williams Classical Principles of Argument In.